Legal Opinion

Nutterville v. McLam

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1961No. 8954PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Justice.

This action was instituted by respondent Nutterville against appellant McLam, to resolve a boundary dispute between them, involving ownership of 9 and ¥12 feet claimed by both parties as a part of their property. The parties are adjoining property owners in Block 6 of Misses (sic) A. A. Lieuallen’s Addition to the City of Moscow, (referred to herein as the Lieuallen Addition), Nutterville owning Lots 13, 14 and 16 (Lot 15 not being designated on the plat), and McLam owning the property immediately to the north, Lots 9, 10, 11 and 12 of the same block. Lots 12 and 13 are…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bayhouse v. UrquidesIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Jones v. SnappTennessee Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Case v. EricsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1927
  4. Wing v. WallaceIdaho Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estelle Jordan v. Lawrence MedleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1983
  2. Hook v. HornerIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  4. Collins v. ParkinsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Hollandsworth v. Cottonwood Elevator CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API