Legal Opinion

Jones v. Snapp

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1851PublishedCited by 16 opinions

The case is stated in the opinion of: the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Totten, J.:

We have not been able to rest this case upon any satisfactory ground of equity jurisdiction.

The objects of the bill are to declare the title of the defendant W. P. House a void title, and to enjoin him from digging ore upon the premises in dispute.

The land was originally granted in 1811 ; and by several mesne conveyances and covenants to convey, the equitable title was vested in one Brobson, who conveyed to one Greorge House in 1815. In 1826 Greorge House entered the land in the name of his son W. P. House, and in 1836 obtained a grant of the land, and held it from that time, as he…

2Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. CremeansWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. Winnegar's Administrator v. Central Passenger Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Dausuel v. DausuelCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1952
  4. Millmaster International Inc., Millmaster International Corp. v. The United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
  5. Bissell v. BissellMontana Supreme Court · 1955

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API