Legal Opinion
State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 10, 1968No. 40924PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Rogosheske, Justice.
Appeal from an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Defendant, Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, operates a large factory which manufactures asphalt roofing materials. It is located near other industrial plants in an area in North Minneapolis zoned for heavy industries. In 1947, when its original plant occupying less than a half a block was built, there were few neighboring houses, but at present a solid residential community, including a new school, surrounds the plant, enlarged now to occupy over two blocks. Incident to its manufacturing process, the plant emits large…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Independent School District No. 35 v. A. Hedenberg & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
- Sanchez v. WaldrupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Jedneak v. Minneapolis General Electric Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
- People v. Dayton Cleaners & Dyers Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- State v. Collingswood Sewerage Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1914
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976