Legal Opinion

People v. Dayton Cleaners & Dyers Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 28, 1937PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

In the Court of Special Sessions of the City of New York, Borough of Queens, defendant was convicted of the crime of maintaining a- public nuisance under subdivision 1 of section 1530 of the Penal Law, and received a suspended sentence. Thereafter, on motion of the district attorney, the suspension of sentence was revoked and a fine of $500 imposed. Defendant appeals from the judgment of conviction and from the order revoking the suspension and imposing the fine.

*333The proofs fail to show that defendant’s business is unlawful, or that it is not conducted properly or by the best known methods for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. VandewaterNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. Friedman v. New York & Harlem RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
  3. Peck v. Newburgh Light, Heat & Power Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1909
  4. Friedman v. . New York and Harlem Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  5. People v. Cuneo Eastern Press, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1931

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. City of Rochester v. Premises Located at 10-12 South Washington StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. MarkovitzCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1979
  3. People v. Amecco Chemicals, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1943
  4. State v. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  5. People v. Accurate Brass Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API