Legal Opinion

Bye v. MacK

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 18, 1994No. Civ. 930301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MESCHKE, Justice.

Duane Bye appealed judgments dismissing his legal malpractice action against Jerome James Mack, John H. Moosbrugger, Richard A. Ohlsen, Shirley Ann Dvorak, and Ralph F. Carter, individually and as members of the Law Firm of Mack, Moosbrugger, Ohlsen, Dvorak, Carter, Attorneys at Law, and Jane Freeman. The defendants other than Freeman cross-appealed. We affirm.

Duane Bye, Marvin Arlien, and Roger El-vick formed “Custom Farm Services, Inc.” (CFS) as part of a plan to facilitate the purchase of Bye’s custom combining equipment by Arlien and Elvick. The corporate enterprise was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Layman v. Braunschweigische Maschinenbauanstalt, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Shark v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Avner M. Horton v. United States Steel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961
  4. Martinson Bros. v. HjellumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Oskey Gasoline and Oil Company, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation v. Continental Oil Company, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Osborne v. KeeneyKentucky Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Dan Nelson Construction, Inc. v. Nodland & DicksonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Moen v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Malchose v. KalfellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API