Legal Opinion

Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 2014No. 20130222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROTHERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] John and Lori Finstad appeal from a judgment awarding them $58,000.99 in damages and interest in their action against Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., now known as Southeast Water Users District (“District”), for breach of the lease-back provisions of an option agreement between the parties. The District cross-appealed from the judgment. We conclude the district court erred as a matter of law in ruling the economic duress doctrine relieved the Finstads of their obligations under a subsequent agreement and release they had entered into with the District. Because the…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Nuelle Ex Rel. Reinhardt v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
  3. Fitzmaurice v. FitzmauriceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Reese v. Reese-YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Evangelical Good Samaritan Society v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Hennessey v. Milnor School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Hoff v. City of BurlingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API