Finstad v. Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] John and Lori Finstad appeal from a judgment awarding them $58,000.99 in damages and interest in their action against Ransom-Sargent Water Users, Inc., now known as Southeast Water Users District (“District”), for breach of the lease-back provisions of an option agreement between the parties. The District cross-appealed from the judgment. We conclude the district court erred as a matter of law in ruling the economic duress doctrine relieved the Finstads of their obligations under a subsequent agreement and release they had entered into with the District. Because the…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. HerbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Nuelle Ex Rel. Reinhardt v. WellsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Fitzmaurice v. FitzmauriceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Beck v. LindNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Centric Corp. v. Morrison-Knudsen Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Vogel v. Marathon Oil CorporationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
- Reese v. Reese-YoungNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
- Evangelical Good Samaritan Society v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Hennessey v. Milnor School DistrictNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- Hoff v. City of BurlingtonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.