Legal Opinion

Wilhelm v. Gray

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 14, 1989No. 61296Published

1Dissent

KAUGER, Justice,

with whom DOOLIN, C.J., and OPALA, J. join, dissenting.

The issues fully briefed and presented on appeal are: 1) Whether the relief provided by 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (1981)1 may be pursued without recourse to, or exhaustion of, state remedies; 2) Whether the existence of a meaningful state post-deprivation hearing bars the institution of a § 1983 action; and 3) Whether, under the rationale of Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d 420 (1981), Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 106 S.Ct. 662, 88 L.Ed.2d 662 (1986); Davidson v. Cannon, 474 U.S. 344, 106 S.Ct. 668,…

Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API