In re the Detention of Fox
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*380¶1 Harry Fox, Robert Jones, and Anthony Jacka are chapter 71.09 RCW sexually violent predators (SVPs). Fox appeals the trial court’s summary judgment dismissal of a full evidentiary hearing/SVP recommitment trial it had previously ordered.1 We granted Jones’ request for discretionary review of a trial court order denying his request for a new commitment trial. We granted Jacka’s similar request for discretionary review of a trial court order (1) ruling amended RCW 71.09.090 constitutional and (2) denying his request for a full evidentiary hearing/ SVP recommitment trial. We have consolidated…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Zinermon v. BurchSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Foucha v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. McCuistionWashington Supreme Court · 2012
- Arkansas Department of Correction v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- In Re Detention of ReimerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- In re the Detention of McGaryCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- In re the Detention of ReimerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.