State ex rel. Arizona Department of Health Services v. Gottsfield
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVINE, Judge.
¶ 1 The State of Arizona, the Arizona Department of Health Services, Arizona State Hospital, and the Arizona Community Protection and Treatment Center (“ACPTC”) seek relief from the superior court’s order concluding that Robert Medrano’s counsel be allowed to conduct ex parte interviews with ACPTC employees without the consent of the State. The State presents the following arguments on appeal: (1) this court has jurisdiction to hear and decide this special action because the case raises a purely legal question of statewide importance that may occur again and cannot be…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Kansas v. CraneSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Allen v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seling v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Martin v. ReinsteinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re MH 2007-000629Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- STATE EX REL. DEPT. OF HEALTH v. GottsfieldCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- In Re Fredrick B.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- In Re Mh Xxxx-XxxxxxCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Lopez v. CoreCivicDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.