Legal Opinion

Newport v. Temescal Water Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided August 10, 1906No. L.A. No. 1788PublishedCited by 29 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenshaw, J.

Perris Valley is a basin of forty or fifty square miles in extent. The surface soil is of inferior character, arid and alkaline. At a depth varying from eight to forty feet below the surface the land consists of unstratified silt, detritus, and gravels. The voids in this soil carry water, and the water-bearing soils are from one hundred to four hundred feet in depth. Contiguous to Perris Valley is Menefee Valley, a somewhat similar though smaller tract of land. The surface soil of the Menefee Valley is of better quality than that of Perris Valley, and, like the latter, rests on water-bearing…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Katz v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Montecito Valley Water Co. v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Tulare Irrigation District v. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Peabody v. City of VallejoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  3. City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Lindsay-Strathmore Irrigation Dist. v. Superior Court of Tulare Cty.California Supreme Court · 1920
  5. City of San Bernardino v. City of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API