Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Coll v. Johnson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1999No. 24,884PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FRANCHINI, Justice.

{1} The plaintiffs in this case are four members of the New Mexico House of Representatives, five private citizens, and a nonprofit corporation (Plaintiffs). Plaintiffs filed this action in district court, attacking the legality of legislation authorizing Indian gaming in New Mexico. See NMSA 1978, §§ 11-13-1 and 11-13-2 (1997) (“HB 399”). We hold that the matter must be dismissed because the Plaintiffs cannot join certain indispensable parties, namely the various Tribes and Pueblos that have gaming compacts with the state. We also reverse the district court’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  3. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Sears v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Madrid v. St. Joseph HospitalNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1996

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. HullCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Pirtle v. Legis. CouncilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Kerr v. ParsonsNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2016

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API