Legal Opinion
American Greyhound Racing, Inc. v. Hull
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 2002No. Nos. 01-16672, 01-17319 and 01-17321PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge CANBY; Dissent by Judge RYMER.
CANBY, Circuit Judge.
Racetrack owners and operators brought this action against the Governor of Arizona1 to challenge the legality of the Governor’s actions in negotiating new gaming compacts with Indian tribes, or in extending the tribes’ existing compacts. The district court denied the Governor’s motion to dismiss on the ground that the compacting tribes were indispensable parties. The court then granted the plaintiffs relief principally on two grounds: (1) the state statute authorizing the Governor to negotiate compacts, A.R.S. § 5-601, was an…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Provident Tradesmens Bank & Trust Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Kiowa Tribe of Oklahoma v. Manufacturing Technologies, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Makah Indian Tribe v. C. William VerityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Saratoga County Chamber of Commerce, Inc. v. PatakiNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Peabody Western Coal CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Wilbur v. LockeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Citizens against Casino Gambling v. KempthorneDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.