Legal Opinion
Fent v. STATE EX REL. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT AUTHORITY
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 24, 2009No. 106611PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
[[Image here]]
KAUGER, J.
Original jurisdiction is assumed. Okla. Const. art. 7, § 4. A written opinion from the Court will follow. However, today we determine that Senate Bill No. 1874, Okla. Sess. L.2008, Ch. 481, §§ 2 and 3, insofar as it pertains to the Oklahoma Conservation Commission and the River Parks Authority, is hereby declared unconstitutional and void, because the enactment violates the one-subject rule mandated by the terms of art. 5, § 57 of the Oklahoma Constitution.
T1 The first impression issues presented are: 1) whether the petitioner is precluded from challenging only a…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Rodgers v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- Jones, Ex Parte Richard DewayneCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2014
- HUNSUCKER v. FALLINSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2017
- BURNS v. CLINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- NOVA HEALTH SYSTEMS v. EdmondsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.