Legal Opinion
NOVA HEALTH SYSTEMS v. Edmondson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 2, 2010No. 107,592PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DISPOSITION BY ORDER
11 Upon consideration of the record, briefs, transeripts, the motion for oral argument, the application for leave to file amicus curiae brief, the petition in error, and the response thereto, in the above styled and numbered cause, THE COURT FINDS:
1. The dispositive issue before us is the applicability of the one-subject rule pursuant to art. 5, § 57 of the Oklahoma Constitution 1 to Senate Bill No. 1878. The bill, allegedly comprised of portions of five separate bills, involves multiple subjects concerning freedom of conscience. Insofar as the one subject rule is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re County Com'rs of Counties Comprising Seventh Judicial Dist.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 347 State Question No. 639Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 314Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
- In Re Initiative Petition No. 382Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
- BURNS v. CLINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- BURNS v. CLINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- BURNS v. CLINESupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.