Legal Opinion
Fent v. Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 8, 1999No. 92,390PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Per curiam
¶ 1 Under 73 O.S.1991, § 160, this Court is given exclusive original jurisdiction to determine the validity of bond issues proposed by respondent, Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Authority (OCIA). Petitioners, Jerry R. Fent and Margaret B. Fent (husband and wife), two resident taxpayers and registered voters of Oklahoma (hereafter taxpayers) brought this original proceeding challenging the constitutionality of two statutes, 73 O.S. Supp.1998, §§ 168.3 and 301, which together authorize OCIA to issue over $300 million dollars in bonds to fund various governmental projects.1 Taxpayers seek…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Woodall v. Chandler Material Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- In Re the Oklahoma Capitol Improvement AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Application of Oklahoma Capitol Improvement Auth.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Gilbert Central Corp. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1986
- Oklahoma Industries Authority v. BarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Fent v. Contingency Review BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- TORRES v. SEABOARD FOODS, LLCSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Edmondson v. PearceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
- LEE v. BUENOSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2016
- Douglas v. Cox Retirement Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.