Legal Opinion

Chism v. Protective Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 2010No. 99,291PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Luckert, J.:

Past decisions of this court have held that an insurance company may rescind an insurance contract if an insured makes fraudulent material misrepresentations when applying for an insurance policy. A different rule applies, however, if the insurance company’s agent completed the application and either knowingly entered false information or failed to ask the applicant for the information. Under those circumstances, the insurance company is estopped from rescinding the policy. This is true even if the applicant could have discovered the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. St. Amant v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Tetuan v. A.H. Robins Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Albers v. NelsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  4. John Hancock Mutual Life Insurance Company v. Debra WeismanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  5. United States v. Frank SquiresCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  2. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance v. WoolmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. Evergreen Recycle, L.L.C. v. Indiana Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2015
  4. Castleberry v. DeBrotSupreme Court of Kansas · 2018
  5. Becker v. The Bar Plan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2018

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API