Legal Opinion

Albers v. Nelson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 12, 1991No. 65462PublishedCited by 75 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Herd, J.:

This is an ejectment action. Plaintiffs Lorraine Albers and Ralph Luther seek to recover possession of real estate sold to them by defendants Loring and Rosemary Nelson. The Nelsons resist, contending the sale agreement was intended as an equitable mortgage, and assert the contract is void based upon fraud and usury. The district court granted summary judgment to Albers and Luther, finding that the contract was clear and unambiguous, that fraud was improperly pled, that there was insufficient evidence to support a claim of fraud, and that the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nordstrom v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1980
  2. Slaymaker v. Westgate State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  3. Patterson v. BrouhardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1990
  4. Wood River Pipeline Co. v. Willbros Energy Services Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
  5. Citizens State Bank v. GilmoreSupreme Court of Kansas · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by75 opinions

  1. Xiangyuan (Sue) Zhu v. Countrywide Realty, Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2001
  2. Gerhardt v. HarrisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Wayman v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
  4. Betaco, Inc. v. Cessna Aircraft CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  5. Gore v. BerenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994

70 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API