Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Robinson

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1916No. 1823PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Roosevelt County; G. A. Richardson,’ Judge. Action by J. A. Wilson 'and others against J. Robinson and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal;'' Relationship between parties to a transaction does not of itself create prima facie presumption of fraud in transaction.' ' Shealy v.' Edwards, 75 Ala. 411;- Duffield v. Deíancey, 36 111. 258; Norfolk City Nat.

Read the full summary

Appeal from District Court, Roosevelt County; G. A. Richardson,’ Judge. Action by J. A. Wilson 'and others against J. Robinson and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal;'' Relationship between parties to a transaction does not of itself create prima facie presumption of fraud in transaction.' ' Shealy v.' Edwards, 75 Ala. 411;- Duffield v. Deíancey, 36 111. 258; Norfolk City Nat. Bank v. Bridgers, 114 N. C. 383; Lane v. Stárr, 1 S. D. 107; Gottlieb v. Thatcher, 151. U, S'. 271,. 38 L. Ed. 157. As to' who is a bona fide purchaser from fraudulent grantee, see, 20 Cyc. 648,…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT.

ROBERTS, C. J.

Appellee, in September, 1913, was the owner of 320 acres of land in Eoosevelt county, this state. He saw an advertisement in some newspaper, inserted by one S. D. Harlow, of Kansas City, Kan., in which the latter stated that he was agent for certain property in Kansas City which he was authorized to trade for farm property. Appellee wrote Harlow, saying that he' would like to trade his Eoosevelt county farm for Kansas-City property. After some correspondence- Iiarlow wrote appellee a letter, a part of which was as follows:

“We have succeeded in finding…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Chatham Furnace Co. v. MoffattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  3. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  4. Pomeroy v. BentonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  5. Wannell v. KemSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jones v. FriedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Thrams v. BlockNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Bennett v. FinleyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Ham v. HartNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1954
  5. McKenzie County v. CasadyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API