Legal Opinion

Pomeroy v. Benton

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided October 15, 1874PublishedCited by 50 opinions

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. I. A partner who improperly uses the money of the firm (and money raised by using the name of the firm, is money of the firm as much as any other) shall pay interest on the misused money and account for any profits derived from its use. (G-lossington vs. Waters, 1 Sim. and St., 124; Stoughton vs. Lynch, 1 Johns. Ch., 467; Long vs.-Majestre, 1 Johns.

Read the full summary

Appeal from St. Louis Circuit Court. I. A partner who improperly uses the money of the firm (and money raised by using the name of the firm, is money of the firm as much as any other) shall pay interest on the misused money and account for any profits derived from its use. (G-lossington vs. Waters, 1 Sim. and St., 124; Stoughton vs. Lynch, 1 Johns. Ch., 467; Long vs.-Majestre, 1 Johns. Oh., 305; 3d Kent. 5th Ed., 51; Collyer on Part., §§ 184, 185, 186, 221, 249 ; Somerville vs. McKay, 16 Yesey, 282.) II. If defendant destroys testimony to prevent its use against him, the law furnishes a…

1Opinion of the CourtSheewood, Judge

This was a suit in the nature of a bill in equity. The plaintiff and defendant were for a number of years co-partners, under the name and style of Pomeroy & Benton, engaged in .the wholesale dry goods business, in the city of St. Louis, where the defendant resided and managed the business of the firm, while the plaintiff resided in the city of New York, attended to the affairs of the firm at that point, and seldom visited St. Louis.

The petition, in substance, charges that defendant, in vio iation of the articles of co-partnership and of his duty as part tier, and without the knowledge or…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Juzan v. ToulminSupreme Court of Alabama · 1846
  2. Russell & Co. v. State Ins.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1874
  3. Biddle v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  4. Elfrank ex rel. Elfrank v. SeilerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Jillett v. Union National BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1874

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Paddock v. SomesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1890
  2. Tietjens v. General Motors CorporationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Harrison v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1884
  4. Speed v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894
  5. Blair v. Chicago & Alton RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1886

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API