Legal Opinion

In re Feinman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 17, 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

This is a petition to suspend respondent from the practice of *180law forthwith, pending final disposition on formal disciplinary charges of misconduct. Respondent, who has failed to appear in this proceeding, was admitted to practice in New York in 1938, and has maintained a law office within this Judicial Department at relevant times since then.

Petitioner opened its investigation on a complaint from a colleague that respondent, having suffered financial reverses, had misappropriated client funds and recently left the country. That investigation revealed that since 1990,…

3Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re BrillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  2. In re KurtzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  2. In re FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API