Legal Opinion
In re Kaye
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 9, 1993PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Before us is a petition to suspend respondent from the *100practice of law pending these disciplinary proceedings on the ground of incontrovertible evidence of serious professional misconduct. Respondent, who has failed to answer the petition, was admitted to practice at the First Judicial Department in 1967, under the name William Spiegler Kaye, and has maintained an office for such practice within this Department at all relevant times since then. During that period he has appeared as counsel in numerous bankruptcy proceedings in the Eastern and Southern Districts of New York.
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- In re DomingoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re ErdheimAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- In re FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4Cited by4 opinions
- In re KayeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- In re KadishAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re ReisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re ReisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012