Legal Opinion

In re Kurtz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 18, 1991PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Petitioner, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Department, seeks an order pursuant to 22 NYCRR 603.4 (e) (1) (i) and (iii) suspending respondent from the practice of law forthwith based upon uncontroverted evidence of misconduct and upon his failure to cooperate with the Committee’s investigation into allegations of his professional misconduct.

Respondent, Irving Kurtz, was admitted to the practice of law in New York by the First Judicial Department on February 10, 1975. At all times relevant herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re GordonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  2. In re JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. In re ElkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  2. In re PantojaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API