In re Feinman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to practice at this Judicial De*295partment in 1938, and has maintained an office for such practice within the Department at all times relevant to these proceedings. Over a course of time between 1987 and 1992, respondent engaged in certain ongoing activities by which he stole and retained funds for personal use from clients in matters having to do with estates and property transactions, and misrepresented the status of those cases to the clients. When this matter was presented to petitioner for investigation, respondent failed to appear, and this Court…
3Cases cited2 opinions
- In re FeinmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re KatzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991