Legal Opinion
City of Yakima v. Surface Transportation Board
District Court, E.D. Washington
Decided January 15, 1999No. CY-98-30331-AAMPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
McDONALD, District Judge.
BEFORE THE COURT is intervenor-defendant- Burlington Northern Santa Fe Corporation’s (“BNSF”) motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.CivP. 12(b)(1) (Ct.Rec.20) and motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) (Ct. Rec.23). The United States Government defendants, the Surface Transportation Board (“STB”) and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), have also filed a 12(b)(1) motion to dismiss for lack of subject…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Bennett v. SpearSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Heckler v. ChaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. ClarkeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Buckingham Township v. WykleDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2001
- Clarke v. HolderDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- City of Fairborn, Ohio v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2023
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.