Legal Opinion
Buckingham Township v. Wykle
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided June 22, 2001No. CIV. A. 99-621PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
WALDMAN, District Judge.
I. Introduction
This case arises out of the proposed improvement of U.S. Route 202, Section 700 (“Section 700”) and development of an interchange at Route 202 and State Route 313. Plaintiff is concerned that peaceful and scenic Buckingham Township in Bucks County will be spoiled if defendants are allowed to proceed as planned.
As a federal aid project, the Section 700 project is subject to various federal statutory requirements. In a 97 page amended complaint, plaintiff alleges that defendants used falsified data and violated virtually every applicable…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Marsh v. Oregon Natural Resources CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Audubon Naturalist Society of the Central Atlantic States, Inc. v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2007
- Solebury Township v. Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Sierra Club v. United States Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2004
- American Bankers Ass'n v. National Credit Union AdministrationDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
- Municipality of Anchorage v. AlaskaDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2005
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.