Legal Opinion
Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation Commission
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 9, 2001No. C01-0750 TEHPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
THELTON E. HENDERSON, District Judge.
These matters came before the Court on Tuesday, November 6, 2001, on the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. After careful consideration of the parties’ written and oral arguments, this Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART each of the parties’ motions as described in the discussion below.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
This suit arises out of the federal Clean Air Act (“CAA”), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7401-7671q (2001), the history of which has been well-documented elsewhere. See, e.g., Citizens for a Better Env’t v.…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bayview Hunters Point Community Advocates v. Metropolitan Transportation CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- West Virginia Highlands Conservancy v. Southeastern Land, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2018