Legal Opinion
Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AM
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided July 8, 1987No. WCB 82-10103; CA A38048Published
1Opinion of the Court
739 P.2d 597 (1987)
86 Or.App. 334
In the matter of the Compensation of Lawrence N. SULLIVAN, Claimant.
Lawrence N. Sullivan, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent,
v.
BANISTER PIPELINE AM and Argonaut Insurance, Respondents-Cross-Petitioners.
WCB 82-10103; CA A38048.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Argued and Submitted September 15, 1986.
Decided July 8, 1987.
Reconsideration Denied September 25, 1987.
James L. Edmunson, Eugene, argued the cause for petitioner-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Christopher D. Moore and Malagon & Moore, Eugene.
Richard W. Davis, Portland, argued the cause and filed the…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saunders v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1975
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. RhoadesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Grace v. SAIF Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Jeld-Wen, Inc. v. PageCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Scheidemantel v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.