Legal Opinion

Ahn v. Frito-Lay, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1988No. WCB 85-00438; CA A44113PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

In this workers’ compensation case, claimants are the children of the deceased worker. In Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Ahn, 84 Or App 427, 734 P2d 15 (1987), we affirmed without opinion the Board’s determination that the worker was suffering from an injury-related emotional condition. While that decision was pending, the worker committed suicide. On this review, we decide what impact the suicide has on claimants’ entitlement to benefits under ORS 656.204 and ORS 656.218.

ORS 656.156(1) provides:

“If injury or death results to a worker from the deliberate intention of the worker to produce such injury or…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Saunders v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  2. McGill v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  3. Sullivan v. Banister Pipeline AMCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vredenburg Ex Rel. Vredenburg v. Sedgwick CMSNevada Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Carling National Breweries v. McClureCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API