Legal Opinion

Quist v. Leapley

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 10, 1992No. 17573PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Per curiam

Bradley David Quist (Quist) appeals the denial of his application for habeas corpus relief from his convictions for one count of first degree robbery and one count of second degree burglary. We reverse and remand.

FACTS

On March 22, 1988, state filed an information charging Quist with one count of first degree robbery and a second information charging him with one count of second degree burglary. The informations were filed in connection with a robbery that occurred at a shopping mall in Aberdeen, South Dakota in January 1988. In addition to the robbery charge, state filed a Part II habitual…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Application of GarritsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. State v. SuttonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Logan v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. MoellerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Monette v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Weiker v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  5. State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API