Monette v. Weber
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SEVERSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Mitchell Monette appeals the ha-beas court’s rulings that his no contest plea was voluntary, intelligent and knowing; that he received effective assistance of counsel; and that denial of a firearms expert did not violate his constitutional rights.
FACTS
[¶2.] On October 28, 2003, Monette’s then wife Cindy returned home intoxicated. An altercation ensued, which ended with Cindy receiving disfiguring facial injuries from a gun shot. Monette was arrested on October 29, 2003, and counsel was appointed to represent him. Monette was indicted on November 5, 2003, with Count 1:…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Malloy v. HoganSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rosen v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- State v. BilbenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Piper v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.