Legal Opinion

State v. Bilben

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 2014No. 26782PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZINTER, Justice.

[¶ 1.] In 2012, Wayne Bilben was charged with driving under the influence of alcohol. A part II information alleged that he had three prior DUI convictions within the last ten years (in 2003, 2004, and 2007). Bilben moved to strike the prior convictions. He claimed that he pleaded guilty to the prior DUI charges without adequate Boykin advisements, rendering the prior convictions invalid. The circuit court denied his motion. On appeal, Bilben withdraws his challenge to his 2004 conviction, but continues to challenge the validity of his 2003 and 2007 convictions. We affirm in…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Custis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Nachtigall v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Monette v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Logan v. SolemSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. EdwardsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Kleinsasser v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Siers v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Oleson v. YoungSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
  5. State v. ChantSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API