Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Weiker v. Solem

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1994No. 18337PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

Kenneth Weiker (Weiker) appeals from an Order denying his Application for Writ of Habeas Corpus. We affirm.

FACTS

On March 22,1982, State filed an Information. Part I charged Weiker with one count of distribution of hashish, two counts of distribution of cocaine and one count of receiving stolen property. Part II of the Information charged Weiker as a habitual offender.

That same day, Weiker was arraigned on Part I and Part II of the Information by the Honorable Marshall Young. Judge Young fully advised Weiker of his Boykin rights. On April 19, 1982, a hearing was held because…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Mabry v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State v. DeNoyerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. GoodwinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Flute v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. New v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  5. McDonough v. WeberSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API