Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Masa

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 84-1359PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCelebrezze, C.J.

The question before us is whether appellee had justifiable cause for his failure to support his daughter in the year prior to the filing of this adoption petition, given the fact that his sole income during this period was a minimal welfare payment of eighty-three dollars per month. We answer that question in the affirmative.

Our analysis must begin with the recognition that the right of a natural parent to the care and custody of his children is one of the most precious and fundamental in law. Santosky v. Kramer (1982), 455 U.S. 745, 753; In re Baby Girl Baxter (1985), 17 Ohio St. 3d 229,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re Baby Girl BaxterOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  4. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. In re Adoption of SchoeppnerOhio Supreme Court · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of GibsonOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State ex rel. Otten v. HendersonOhio Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re Adoption of PushcarOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  5. In re Adoption of LayOhio Supreme Court · 1986

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API