Legal Opinion

In re Baby Girl Baxter

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 12, 1985No. 84-1340PublishedCited by 76 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

This case raises three issues. The first is whether Evelyn Baxter was denied the proper representation of counsel during the proceedings in Carroll County Juvenile Court.

R.C. 2151.352 and Juv. R. 4(A) provide for the appointment of counsel in cases where parental rights are subject to termination. Furthermore, this court has held that the state must appoint counsel for indigent parents at parental termination proceedings. State, ex rel. Heller, v. Miller (1980), 61 Ohio St. 2d 6 [15 O.O.3d 3]. Juv. R. 4(B)(3) and R.C. 2151.281 mandate that the court appoint a guardian ad litem to protect the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Heller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1980

3Cited by76 opinions

  1. In re Adoption of MasaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. In re WilliamsOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. S.S. v. D.M.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. In re RiddleOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  5. In re B.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API