Legal Opinion

In re Adoption of Gibson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1986No. 84-1960PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Per curiam

Our recent decision in In re Adoption of Holcomb (1985), 18 Ohio St. 3d 361, settled the issue certified to us. Holcomb also prescribes the standard of proof necessary to prevail in an adoption-without-consent case. This court stated at 368 that:

“* * * Because cases such as these may involve the termination of fun*172damental parental rights, the party petitioning for adoption has the burden of proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the parent failed to communicate with the child during the requisite one-year period and that there was no justifiable cause for the failure of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. In re Adoption of HolcombOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  3. In re Adoption of MasaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State ex rel. Hanley v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Werden v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Fogle v. SteinerOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In re Adoption of MasaOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State Ex Rel. Gilbert v. City of CincinnatiOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Howard v. WillsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Carroll v. DettyOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API