Legal Opinion
Gibbs v. Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 22, 1986No. B015019PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LILLIE, P. J.
Plaintiff, Robert Gibbs, 1 appeals from judgment dismissing his action for malicious prosecution as to defendants Haight, Dickson, Brown & Bonesteel and Roy Weatherup after their demurrer to the complaint was sustained without leave to amend.
Factual and Procedural Background
Southwest Properties, Inc., Clifford and Eleanor Wolfswinkel and Calvin Wolfswinkel retained Robert Gibbs to represent them as their lead counsel in an Arizona lawsuit to which they were parties. Gibbs represented Southwest Properties, Inc. and the Wolfswinkels until the Arizona court granted his motion…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bertero v. National General Corp.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Buckaloo v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- Jaffe v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Scannell v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Mudge v. SteinhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Morales v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Barton v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Barrett Mobile Home Transport, Inc. v. McGuginSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
- Roger Cleveland Golf Co. v. Krane & Smith, APCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Rare Coin Galleries, Inc. v. A-Mark Coin Co.California Court of Appeal · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.