Legal Opinion

Velasquez v. Senko

District Court, N.D. California

Decided March 31, 1986No. C-84-20723PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER RE DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS AND FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT

AGUILAR, District Judge.

This amended class action complaint (“Complaint”) alleges violations of plaintiffs’ constitutional and statutory rights resulting from a series of raids conducted by the Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Border Patrol, and local police. 1 The named plaintiffs, who are eight Hispanic and non-Hispanic persons arrested during the raids, seek declaratory and injunctive relief, and damages. The defendants are various directors, agents, and commissioners of the INS and Border Patrol.…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Tony Velasquez v. John SenkoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. Ashiegbu v. PurvianceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
  3. White v. TaylorDistrict Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1988
  4. (PC) Johnson v. SpearmanDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  5. (PC) Thompson v. RazaviDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2020

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API