Ashiegbu v. Purviance
District Court, S.D. Ohio
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
KINNEARY, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on two separate motions. First, Plaintiff moves to dismiss Defendant Sandi Bartley-Bu-zas’s Answer. Presumably, Plaintiff moves pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure (“Rule”) 12(f). Second, Defendants Penny Purivanee, Ike Lively, Randy Headly, Joyce Mitchell, Sue Creagan, Joseph Harper, Sheilba Berger, Judy Jones and Randy Ferguson (collectively, the “Individual State Defendants”) move to dismiss Plaintiffs complaint pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Plaintiffs motion to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gibson v. American Bankers InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2000
- Barkovic v. Attorney Grievance Comm'nDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2017
- Conner v. U.S. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2014
- Pugh v. SloanOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Causey v. City of Bay CityDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.