Legal Opinion
Clackamas County, Oregon v. Douglas McKay Secretary of the Interior
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided July 28, 1955No. 12533_1PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PRETTYMAN, Circuit Judge.
This case is a sequel to one decided by this court in 1954. 1 It is unnecessary to repeat the long and involved background to the litigation. Our decision was promulgated April 30, 1954. Subsequently, on June 24, 1954, the President approved an Act ox Congress dealing with the subject matter. That Act 2 declared that (1) all the unselected and unpatented odd-numbered sections within the indemnity grants of the Oregon and California Railroad, and included within the boundaries of national forests, are revested railroad grant lands; (2) such lands shall be administered…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gibson v. ChouteauSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Oregon & California Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Ralph D. Kaiser v. Albert F. Adams, and the Real Estate Commission of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1960
- Clackamas County v. MckayCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
3Cited by7 opinions
- Britt v. Federal Land Bank Ass'n of St. LouisAppellate Court of Illinois · 1987
- Skoko v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. GardnerDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1995
- Nevada ex rel. Nevada State Board of Agriculture v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1981
- Skoko v. AndrusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.