Legal Opinion
United States v. Gardner
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided October 2, 1995No. CV-N-95-328-DWHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER
HAGEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff has moved (# 7) for summary judgment. The matter has been fully briefed, argued and submitted for decision. The Court urged the parties to come to an accord and has delayed this decision in the hope they would. None having been reached, the matter will now be decided.
Standard on a Motion for Summary Judgment
Summary Judgment “shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hage v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Krasnecky v. MeffenMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2002
- Forest Guardians v. ThomasDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1997