Legal Opinion
Skoko v. Andrus
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 29, 1979No. 76-3722PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
638 F.2d 1154
Stan SKOKO, Thomas Telford and Robert Schumacher, Board of
County Commissioners, on behalf of Clackamas
County, Oregon, a Political Subdivision
of the State of Oregon,
Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
Cecil D. ANDRUS (successor to Thomas Kleppe), Secretary of
the Interior of the United States, and W. Michael Blumenthal
(successor to William Simon), Secretary of the Treasury of
the United States, Defendants-Appellees,
and
Jeanette Simerville, Larry Callahan and Dale D. Schrock,
Board of County Commissioners, on behalf of Benton
County, Oregon, et al., Intervenor-
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 76-3722.
United…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. DickersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- John K. & Catherine S. Mullen Benevolent Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- City of Los Angeles, a Municipal Corporation v. Brock Adams, as Secretary of Transportation of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Oregon & California Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Adaman Mutual Water Company, a Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Headwaters, Inc. v. Bureau of Land ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Central Montana Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Administrator of the Bonneville Power AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988