Koenig v. Coe
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
VALLÉE, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from a judgment for defendant Clarence S. Coe entered on a jury verdict in an action for damages for personal injuries.
The only specification of error is that the court failed and refused to correctly instruct the jury. Consequently the evi'dence and the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom will be stated in the light most favorable to plaintiff. In determining whether the instructions are correct we must assume that the jury might have believed the evidence on which the cause of action of plaintiff was predicated, and that if correct instructions had been…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Clement v. State Reclamation BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Cary v. WentzelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- Edlund v. Los Angeles Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Carlson v. ShewalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Jessen v. O'DANIELMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Atkins v. BisigierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Casas v. Maulhardt Buick, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1968
- Stephens v. HatfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963