Legal Opinion
Edlund v. Los Angeles Railway Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 19, 1936No. Civ. 10477PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SHINN, J., pro tem.
At about 8 .-35 in the morning of a clear day, plaintiff Esther Bernice Edlund, aged 20 years, drove a coupe into the rear end of defendant’s motor bus. If in so doing she was guilty of contributory negligence as a matter of law, the direction of the verdict by the court was .proper; otherwise it was erroneous. Esther Bernice Edlund is herein referred to as plaintiff. She had been following the bus easterly on wide Olympic Boulevard. It preceded her across the intersection of La Brea, where she stopped for a trafile intersection signal, and she followed it through after the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Christy v. Herbert M. Baruch Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1933
- Binford v. PurcellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Nicholson v. PorterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
3Cited by20 opinions
- Levy-Zentner Co. v. SOUTHERN PAC. TRANSPORTATIONCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Wohlenberg v. MalcewiczCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Carlson v. ShewalterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Pittman v. BoivenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.