Legal Opinion

Sikorski v. Link Electric & Safety Control Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 27, 1997No. 70187PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James M. Porter, Presiding Judge.

Plaintiff-appellant Michael Sikorski appeals from an order of the trial court granting summary judgment in favor of defendant-appellee Link Electric and Safety Control Company on plaintiffs product liability claim that defendant’s safety device failed to protect him from injuries, including loss of his right arm and the fingers of his left hand during operation of a metal stamping press. Plaintiff claims that disputed issues of fact precluded summary judgment. We disagree and affirm the judgment for the reasons stated below.

The eight-hundred-ton metal stamping…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Mitseff v. WheelerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Murphy v. City of ReynoldsburgOhio Supreme Court · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. American Energy Corp. v. DatkuliakOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State v. Madison (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Bliss v. Johns Manville Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021
  4. State Ex Rel. Simmons v. Geauga County Department of Emergency ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Mitchell v. MitchellOhio Court of Appeals · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API