Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Mitchell

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1998No. C.A. Case No. 16626. T.C. Case No. DM 91-83PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frederick N. Young, Presiding Judge.

Appellants Melanie L. Mitchell (n.k.a. Colley) and Richard Kaplan appeal from a judgment of the Montgomery County Common Pleas Court, Domestic Relations Division, imposing sanctions against them for frivolous conduct.

The appellants advance two assignments of error. First, they contend that the trial court erred by declaring frivolous Colley’s motion for a change in child custody. Next, the appellants claim that the trial court erred when it found nothing in Ohio’s frivolous-conduct statute requiring a motion for attorney fees to be in writing.

The present…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lable & Co. v. FlowersOhio Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Passmore v. Greene County Board of ElectionsOhio Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Payne v. A.O. Smith Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. Sikorski v. Link Electric & Safety Control Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. Tomb & Associates, Inc. v. WagnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re G.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2017
  2. Wolford v. WillisOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
  3. C.G. v. C.L., 90341 (6-26-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API