Legal Opinion

Pacific Coast Railway Co. v. Porter

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1887No. 12122PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from a portion of a judgment of the Superior Court of San Luis Obispo County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Hayne, C.

This was a proceeding to condemn a strip of the defendants’ land for the purposes of the plaintiff’s road. The cause was tried by a jury, who rendered a verdict, and judgment was entered thereon, and on the additional findings of the court condemning the said land, and decreeing that the plaintiff pa)r to the defendants Uriah and Fanny Porter,—1. The sum of seventy-five dollars, adjudged to be the value of the land taken; 2. The sum of eight hundred dollars, as damages to the remainder of the land; and 3. .The sum of two hundred and seventy-five dollars, cost of fencing, *262and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Tehama County v. BryanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Butte County v. BoydstonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Algier v. Steamer MariaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Flandreau v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Green v. Jackson Water Co.California Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Clements v. T. R. Bechtel Co.California Supreme Court · 1954
  2. City of Los Angeles v. PomeroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Harrington v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. Reed Orchard Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
  5. San José & Almaden Railroad v. MayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API