Legal Opinion

Columbus Check Cashers v. Rodgers, 08ap-149 (10-23-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 23, 2008No. 08AP-149PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Columbus Check Cashers, Inc., appeals from a judgment of the Franklin County Municipal Court that denied its request for attorney fees resulting from a legal action against defendant-appellee, Michael Rodgers. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

{¶ 2} On January 2, 2007, appellee entered into a consumer loan agreement (payday advance) with appellant to borrow $300. Appellee executed a written loan agreement setting forth the terms of the loan. The agreement included a provision containing the following pertinent language:

I agree to repay Columbus Check…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Knapp v. Edwards LaboratoriesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Nottingdale Homeowners' Ass'n v. DarbyOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Sorin v. Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Worth v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. McConnell v. Hunt Sports EnterprisesOhio Court of Appeals · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Cowans v. Ohio State Racing Comm.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Hartman v. Dept. of Transp., 08ap-599 (2-5-2009)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Henderson v. HaverfieldOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. State ex rel. Squire v. PhippsOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
  5. Whitney Woods Homeowners' Assn., Inc. v. SteagallOhio Court of Appeals · 2025

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API