Legal Opinion

Menschik v. Mid-America Pipeline Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 11, 1991No. WD 43069PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Judge.

Mid-America Pipeline Company appeals from a judgment in favor of Sharon Men-schik and her husband, Charles Menschik, Gary Smith and Ronald Smith based upon jury verdicts in their respective claims for personal injuries sustained in an L.P. (liquid propane) explosion and fire. The respective verdicts were for $1,092,208 (Sharon Menschik); $78,854 (Charles Menschik); $736,895 (Gary Smith); and $152,666 (Ronald Smith). The damage awards were reduced by amounts which had been received by the plaintiffs from other defendants in settlement, and judgments entered for the respective…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keener v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
  2. Krug v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  3. Racer v. UttermanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Duke v. Gulf & Western Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Donahue v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Vitanza v. Upjohn Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  2. Robert Ford Bobbie Sue Ford v. Gacs, Inc., Robert Ford Bobbie Sue Ford v. Gacs, Inc. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
  3. Reggie Elliott v. El Paso CorporationMississippi Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Santoro Ex Rel. Santoro v. DonnellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2004
  5. Richcreek v. General Motors Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API