Johnson v. Kirby
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the county of Nevada. The judgment was on demurrer to the complaint. The facts appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Appeal by plaintiff from judgment. The action was against Charles K. Kirby, Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Company, Maltby G. Lane, and Richard H. Lane. The court sustained the demurrer of defendant Kirby, of defendant the Mount Auburn Gold Quartz Mining Company, and of defendants M. G. Lane, and R. H. Lane, to the complaint, on the ground of misjoinder of parties defendant, and on the further ground that several causes of action have been, improperly united.
Whether the court ruled correctly on these demurrers is the question to be considered and determined. It is averred in the complaint…
2Cited by8 opinions
- People v. McKennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Young v. New Pedrara Onyx Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
- Peters v. BigelowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- Kirby v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Bohn v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.