Legal Opinion

Lenn v. Bottem

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 23, 2008No. 120509806; A133691PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.

Plaintiffs initiated this action to obtain title to a strip of defendants’ land by way of adverse possession or boundary by agreement. The trial court rejected their claims and ruled for defendants. Defendants then sought an award of attorney fees under ORS 20.105(1) and an enhanced prevailing party fee under ORS 20.190(3), arguing that there was no objectively reasonable basis for either of plaintiffs’ claims, given the existence of certain documents of which plaintiffs were aware that conclusively defeated their claims. The trial court agreed and awarded the attorney fees and an enhanced…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mattiza v. FosterOregon Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Secor Investments, LLC v. AndereggCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
  3. Shumake v. FosheeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  4. North Marion School District 15 Ex Rel. Trejo v. Acstar InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Dimeo v. GesikCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Williams v. SALEM WOMEN'S CLINICCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
  2. Morasch v. HoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Beaverton School District 48J v. WardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. De Jaray v. Lattice Semiconductor CorporationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
  5. Lenn v. BaldwinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API